Date of Preparation: | August 2024 year |
Number of pages: | 39, Arial, 1 spacing, 10 pt |
Graphs and charts: | 3 |
Tables: | 20 |
Payment method: | prepayment |
Production method: | e-mail or courier electronically or in printed form |
Report language: | ukrainian, russian, english |
1. A detailed analysis of the situation of state and private actors in the sphere of social enterprise, including an overview of initiatives, policies and legislation.
1.1. The part is in. Description of the subject of investigation (social enterprise)
1.2. Analysis of the legislative framework related to social enterprise (the flow of laws on which social enterprises in the region are based) 8
1.3. Trends in the development of social entrepreneurship in the Khmelnytskyi region (popular with those of social entrepreneurship in the region) - based on the respondents’ experience
1.4. Trends in social enterprise and social initiatives in Ukraine, which can also develop in the Khmelnytskyi region
2. Researching the minds attached to the region, which contribute to the development of social enterprise, such as access to resources, government support, financial grants, etc.
2.1. Basic characteristics of the region (macroeconomics, economic structure of the region, food base (galusian economies that can develop in the region), plans for the development of local enterprises - analytical research
2.2. Human resources (employment, unemployment, major social problems) – analytical research, interviews
2.3. Analysis of the mutual relations of the authorities, local self-government bodies, activists and the population who are involved in social integration (what problems are covered by the authorities of the state, what are the central self-direction) – based on interviews;
2.4. Activities of international organizations in the region (local and national grant programs - generally for social enterprise) and their influx into the region - based on education
3. Assessing key keywords in the public sector, identifying priorities and shifting socio-economic development.
3.1. Structuring the main directions of social development of communities to enhance the Galuzian directness of social enterprises
3.2. Identification of the main problems behind the main directions that can be followed up to the creation of significant social enterprises - based on training and desk analysis of obvious social enterprises
4.3. Problems that interfere with the development of social enterprises
4. Mapping of large-scale organizations, social enterprises, small and medium-sized enterprises, initiators and projects active in this area.
4.1. Depending on the criteria for planning (direct business, problems, number of personnel and business turnover) (based on experience)
5.2. Placement of civil society, social enterprises, as well as SMEs in the region on the map according to certain criteria
4.3. Assessment of the level of interconnections between entities in the middle of the skin segment on the map
4.4. Assessment of inter-node interaction (between enterprises of different groups of maps)
4.5. Identification of unfulfilled niches on the map of social enterprises in the region (potential clearings)
5. The most important needs for development and awareness for large-scale organizations, social enterprises, small and medium-sized enterprises received from this service or the implementation of projects in this area.
5.1. The importance of the current level of knowledge of social entrepreneurs about the directions of social enterprise
5.2. They took away the knowledge that lingers around
5.3. The level of satisfaction with the lost light in the sphere of social enterprise
5.4. What kind of knowledge do you want to get rid of, what do you know, where to get it, what are the problems with access to such knowledge
6. Development of recommendations for donor organizations and community organizations to effectively encourage and launch new projects or initiatives aimed at the development of social enterprise.
6.1. Recommendations based on the flow map of social enterprises in the region
6.2. Recommendations based on the main problems in the region identified during the investigation
6.3. Recommendations based on national and regional trends in social enterprise
6.4. Recommendations based on the experience of social workers about the problems that cause stinks
1. Social services provided for socially vulnerable segments of the population
2. Structure of respondents among organizations by organizational and legal form
3. Structure of respondents among citizens in a survey of geographic and relocation status
4. Structure of respondents by age among citizens who completed the survey
5. Based on a survey of respondents from the Khmelnitsky region regarding the sources of information from which they received data about the social enterprise
6. Number of registrations of new NGOs, charitable foundations from 2019 to 2022
7. Changes in the areas of activity of accounting and public organizations before and after the full-scale invasion, %
8. Average number of employees in the surveyed civil and financial institutions before the full-scale invasion and after
9. Assessment of the surveyed PAs and BUs on determining their location of activity, %
10. Changes in the regional location of the main BO/GO cells before and after the start of a full-scale invasion, %
11. Sources of funding that actively used GO/BU before and after the full-scale invasion (% among GO/BU created before 02/24/2022, and again GO/BU, multiple choice, %)
12. Survey of respondents among organizations on challenges in the field of employment and unemployment by category in the Khmelnitsky region
13. Segmentation of the activities of local activists in the Khmelnitsky region based on survey results
14. Name of the international organization that provided various types of assistance to social enterprises in the Khmelnytsky region according to the survey results
15. Segmentation of the main problems that can lead to the creation of relevant social enterprises in the Khmelnitsky region based on the results of a survey of organizations
16. The main problems and their consequences that impede the development of social enterprises in the Khmelnitsky region according to the results of a survey among organizations
17. Segmentation mapping of recipients of assistance from organizations that are considered social enterprises in the Khmelnitsky region
18. Segmentation mapping by recipient organizations and by type of organizations that are considered social enterprises in the Khmelnitsky region
19. Structure of the answer to the question of what exactly organizations consider a social enterprise according to respondents in the Khmelnitsky region
20. Assessing the compliance of the definition of “social entrepreneurship” with the personal views of respondents from residents of the Khmelnitsky region
1. Results of a survey on interaction between authorities, local government and social entrepreneurs in the Khmelnitsky region
2. Analysis of cooperation between civil defense and accounting between different types of organizations before and after the start of a full-scale invasion
3. Structure of the answer to the question of what exactly residents know about a social enterprise according to respondents in the Khmelnitsky region